Track all accessibility issues

Explore Accessibility Tracker

New SaaS Platform Centralizes Accessibility Compliance Management

The Accessibility Tracker Platform centralizes accessibility compliance management by tracking every website and app against a real WCAG audit in one place.

You upload your audit reports, prioritize the issues, assign the work, fix with built-in AI, validate, and produce compliance documentation, all from a single dashboard.

How Tracker Platform Centralizes Accessibility Management
Key Point What It Means for You
Audit-Based Tracking Track true WCAG conformance for every property from a real audit report, not partial scan data.
One Program View See all your projects, websites and apps, in a single dashboard.
Built-In Tracker AI Five AI tools guide your team to each fix without leaving the platform.
Prioritization Scoring Sort issues by a legal risk score or a user impact score across the program.
Portfolio Insights AI reviews every project together to show where to direct resources.
Compliance Documentation Generate a VPAT for any project from its current status.


What Makes Running an Accessibility Program Difficult?

Most organizations are not working on a single website. They run a marketing site, a web app, a mobile app, and often a store, each at a different point toward WCAG conformance. Spread that across separate spreadsheets and email threads, and the program loses its shape.

Nobody can say, in one glance, how the whole effort is going. A compliance manager opens several files, reads several formats, and assembles the picture by hand. The platform removes that step by holding every project in one place and keeping each one current.

Seeing the Whole Program From One Dashboard

When you sign in, the dashboard lists every project beside its completion rate and open issue count. A program manager can read the state of every property at once, instead of opening one spreadsheet at a time.

Each project in the Tracker platform is built from a real audit rather than a scan. That matters, because scans surface only a fraction of WCAG issues, while an audit records the full set found through screen reader testing, keyboard testing, and manual evaluation. Tracking against the audit means the score on your dashboard reflects where you actually stand, not a partial reading.

Turning a Static Audit Into Live Tracking

Getting a project going takes one upload. You bring in your audit report as an Excel spreadsheet from any provider, map your columns, and the findings become tracked issues inside the platform. A report that used to sit untouched now drives the work.

From there the software settles the question teams stall on: what do we fix first? Two scoring formulas sort the list for you. Risk Factor ranks issues by how often they appear in website accessibility lawsuits, so legal exposure surfaces at the top. User Impact weighs how badly each issue blocks access for people with disabilities. Across the program, the same scoring shows which WCAG criteria cause trouble everywhere, so you can send effort where it counts.

Letting Tracker AI Carry the Hard Part

Knowing what to fix is one thing. Knowing how to fix it is where teams slow down, especially when developers are new to accessibility. Tracker AI sits inside each issue and already holds the audit data and the relevant code, so the help is specific to the problem in front of you.

One tool, Simplify and Explain, restates the issue in plain language and shows why it matters for users. Detailed Technical Answer returns working code and step-by-step instructions. Alternative Approaches proposes a different route when the standard fix clashes with your design, while WCAG Standards walks through the success criterion itself and Custom Analysis covers anything the others miss. Because this lives in the workflow, developers do not paste issue details into ChatGPT or search elsewhere; the context travels with them.

Keeping the Work Organized and Verified

As the team moves, each issue carries its own status, so anyone can see what is untouched, in progress, fixed, or waiting on review. Assign an issue and it appears in that person’s view while still counting toward the project total.

Every issue also keeps a running comment log. Questions, decisions, and implementation notes stay attached to the issue instead of scattering across chat and email. When a developer marks a fix done, it moves to an auditor, who confirms the work or returns it with notes. Validation happens in the platform, so the record of who fixed what, and who checked it, stays intact.

Reporting Up and Documenting WCAG Conformance

Leadership wants to know how the program is doing, and they want it without a week of assembly. The software produces AI progress reports on demand, each written from your real project data rather than a template. Project Insights reads a single project and points to slow spots and next priorities. Portfolio Insights reads every project together, so you can ask where the program stands as a whole and get an answer grounded in the data behind it.

When documentation is the goal, the platform builds a VPAT from the current state of any project. The AI fills in the fields based on tracked status, and a qualified reviewer checks the draft before it becomes a final Accessibility Conformance Report. Since the underlying record is WCAG conformance, the same project supports both ADA work and European Accessibility Act preparation, because the ADA and the EAA both point back to WCAG.

Buying the Platform and Adding a Monitoring Layer

You can purchase the platform online and start on a free plan, with no demo to sit through first. As your program grows, an add-on marketplace lets you bring on team members, projects, issues, scan credits, VPAT credits, and AI interactions one at a time, without rebuilding your plan.

Scanning fits in as ongoing monitoring rather than the foundation. You can schedule scans on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, and new findings raise an alert in your dashboard. It is one more set of tools layered on top of audit-based tracking, useful for catching regressions on a Shopify store, a web app, or internal software as the program runs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to manage an accessibility program rather than a project?

A program covers all of your digital properties at once. Each website or app is a project inside the platform, and the program view rolls those projects up so you can read overall status and direct resources from one place.

Why start from an audit instead of a scan?

A scan catches only a slice of WCAG issues and still needs review for accuracy. An audit records every issue found through manual testing, so the progress you track and the score you report match your real conformance level.

Can one platform cover several sites and apps together?

Yes. You run each property as its own project and use Portfolio Insights to compare them, find shared problem areas, and decide where the program needs attention next.

How does tracking WCAG conformance connect to ADA and EAA compliance?

Both the ADA and the European Accessibility Act look to WCAG as the measure of accessible digital content. Tracking each project toward your target conformance level gives you the record those laws expect.

Is an audit required before you can try the platform?

No. Accessible.org offers a sample audit report you can load to explore how the platform works. For live work, you upload an audit from a qualified provider and track from there.

Get Started

Ready to see how a single platform can completely open up your compliance program? Start free at AccessibilityTracker.com.

Related Posts

Sign up for Accessibility Tracker

New platform has real AI. Tracking and fixing accessibility issues is now much easier.

Kris Rivenburgh, Founder of Accessible.org holding his new Published Book.

Kris Rivenburgh

I've helped thousands of people around the world with accessibility and compliance. You can learn everything in 1 hour with my book (on Amazon).