We released Accessibility Tracker in May 2025 without looking at what the latest and greatest was from the legacy platforms in the market. Sure, we knew generally what was being offered, but there was no in-depth market research conducted before we built Accessibility Tracker.
Instead, we just started building—but not based on what other digital companies were selling. We built Tracker based on what our clients were asking about and the friction points we have experienced for years in the audit and remediation process. Ultimately, we decided to build a new platform that would offer the best experience possible for anyone managing a digital accessibility project from audit to remediation to full WCAG conformance.
And we’ve done that. But we’re not finished—there are many more new features we’re adding in the next 3 months, including AI across all projects (not just individual issues).
Now that Tracker has been live and operational for two months, I decided to see what other options there are in the marketplace specifically for managing digital accessibility projects.
Not general project management apps like Monday.com, Asana, etc., but actual software or apps specifically for tracking and managing accessibility issues.
What the research shows is not a lot has changed. Yes, there are such platforms dedicated to digital accessibility, but you can’t simply go to a website and purchase a subscription. Not only that, but, for the most part, you can’t even look on YouTube and watch a quick overview of the different platforms. Instead, if you want a preview you have to sit through a dreaded sales demo.
Also, here’s another major difference between Tracker and most of the other platforms: Tracker is based on actual audits (you upload your audit report Excel spreadsheet). Most software in the market is based on automated scans.
This is an elephant-sized difference because if you’re using scans, you’re working with extremely skewed data. Scans only flag approximately 25% of WCAG 2.1 AA issues — and even those issues that are flagged still need to review for accuracy. In contrast, if you get your audit report from a reputable provider, the audit report will optimally identify all accessibility issues.
That difference is colossal. There is no law that requires a 100% score on a scan. However, there are several that require full WCAG conformance or where WCAG 2.1 AA conformance is a best practice. Thus, if one of your objectives is legal compliance, a scan-based platform really doesn’t help.
Here’s a summary review at some of the offerings we came across starting with ours.
| Platform | Key Features | Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Accessible.org’s Accessibility Tracker | Based on actual accessibility audit reports (not automated scans). Track issues toward full WCAG conformance. Invite team members, update issue status, integrated AI for fixes, analytics and reports. Two prioritization formulas for instant issue sorting. | Starting at $19/month |
| Allyant HUB Accessibility Platform | Unclear if scan-based or audit-based. Aggregates automated and manual testing results. Jira integration. High-level audit results. Scheduled automated scans. CI/CD tools for developers. | Not publicly available |
| TPGI’s ARC Platform | Unclear if based on real audits. Analytics dashboard for automated tests and manual engagements. Document/asset organization with team access. Full API integration for Azure DevOps, JIRA, Excel reports, and development pipelines. | Not publicly available |
| Accessible Web’s RAMP | Automated scanning system with prioritized remediation tasks. Team member assignment. Jira integration. Appears to be scan-based despite “audit results” terminology. | Starting at $49/month |
| Level Access Platform | Limited specifics available. Includes automated and manual testing, ongoing monitoring and scanning, analytics. Integrates with tech ecosystem. | Not publicly available |
| Siteimprove Platform | Ambiguous feature set. Catches issues on websites and PDFs. Automatic scans with issue prioritization. Multi-team member assignment. | Not publicly available |
| Deque axe Tools | Trio of testing tools (axe DevTools, axe Auditor, axe Monitor). Unclear if centralized platform exists for project organization. | Not publicly available |
Table of Contents
Accessible.org’s Accessibility Tracker
Based on an actual accessibility audit report (vs. an automated scan) so you can track issues and works towards full WCAG conformance. Invite team members, change the status of each issue (e.g., in progress, completed, validated), integrated AI to help teams fix every issue (even if they’re new to accessibility), analytics and reports to track progress. Instantly sort issues by one of two different prioritization formulas available.
Available to purchase online. Pricing:
- Free plan available.
- Small Business plan is $19/month.
- Company plan is $49/month.
- Enterprise plan is $99/month.
All plans can be purchased on a monthly basis (no subscription required). Discounts with annual and bi-annual subscriptions. You can purchase feature add-ons individually with all plans. For example, add an additional team member or more issues for any plan.
Learn more at AccessibilityTracker.com.
Allyant HUB Accessibility Platform
We can’t tell from the Allyant page whether their platform is scan-based or based on an actual audit. Their platform “aggregates results from automated and manual testing, with a high-level overview of each digital property we’re testing.” Integrated with Jira. High level audit results. Schedule automated or on-demand scans for monitoring. Test code and developers can build with A11yant CI/CD tools.
Request a demo.
Learn more at Allyant’s platform page.
TPGI’s ARC Platform
Again, it’s unclear if TPGI’s ARC platform is based on real audit results. ARC has analytics and you can “review accessibility data and progress from automated tests of user flow, pages or components, manual engagements, or even on-demand scans.”
You can “organize documents, assets, manual testing, and automated testing results in a single location” with team-based access. Everything in ARC runs through their API, so all portal features can be integrated directly into your existing tools. Run accessibility tests in Azure DevOps, create JIRA tickets for issues, generate Excel reports, or integrate anywhere in your development pipeline.
Schedule a demo.
Learn more at TPGI’s ARC platform page.
Accessible Web’s RAMP
RAMP uses an automated scanning system for websites and prioritizes remediation tasks. You can assign accessibility work to team members. You can also “push audit results and tasks to the project management system” with Jira integration.
Yet again, the phrase “push audit results” is ambiguous, but given the rest of Ramp’s description, the RAMP software is based on a scan. What often happens in digital accessibility is companies will conflate the terms “scan,” “testing,” and “audit” to make the status of their scan to appear more lofty than it is.
Available to purchase online. Pricing:
- Starter: $49/month
- Advanced: $99/month
- Pro: $299/month
- Pro+: $599/month
Learn more at Accessible Web’s RAMP software page.
Level Access Platform
When you visit Level Access’s page specifically for their platform and services, you’re immediately told their platform is the “market’s most advanced platform,” but beyond a single block paragraph found under the heading “Unified Platform”, there aren’t a lot of specifics that tell you exactly what the platform is or does.
The platform is said to include “automated and manual testing for all channels, ongoing monitoring and scanning, and robust analytics. The platform also “integrates with your tech ecosystem.”
Request a demo.
Learn more at Level Access’s platform and services page.
Siteimprove Platform
A similar theme resurfaced with Siteimprove: ambiguity. It’s really hard to extract specifics on what Siteimprove’s platform does. Their “software catches issues you might miss” on websites and PDFs. Their automatic scans pinpoint and prioritize issues and you can assign issues to multiple team members.
Request a demo.
Learn more at Siteimprove’s platform page.
Deque axe Tools
If you look under Deque’s tools in the navigation menu, you’ll see a link for the axe Tools Overview along with “Full service platform,” but the page mostly identifies a trio of Deque’s different accessibility testing tools (axe DevTools, axe Auditor, and axe Monitor) along with their benefits without going further than a prompt of “Ready for Enterprise-grade testing?”
I have to think Deque has some type of centralized platform to organize projects, but, if so, it’s definitely not highlighted.
Request a demo.
Learn more at Deque’s axe tools page.
Summary
After reviewing the sales pages for several of the most notorious digital accessibility project management platforms, I’m not surprised with the results. The state of the market products aligns with what my presumption was before we built Accessibility Tracker. Here are the 3 key takeaways:
- Most are scan-based
- Most are vague in what their capabilities are
- Most are not available for direct purchase
Basically, the market has stayed the same from a few years ago.
